Around the water cooler: Lower speed limit to reduce gas use?
Aug 4, 2008
THIS WEEK'S QUESTION:
Should the national speed limit be lowered to 60 mph to reduce gas use?
Yes: 5
No: 5
■ Karen Anderson: Yes. It should be lowered so our actual speed on 101 could drop to 75.
■ Bert Berson: Yes. Experts say lower demand has already resulted in lower prices.
■ Chris Bryant: No. People will not slow down. High cost of fuel is enough incentive to conserve.
■ David Cohen: No. While it would save some gasoline, the punitive nature of the lower speed limit would only result in an increase in the number of speeding tickets.
■ Julian Mancias: Yes. By lowering the speed limit we will use less gas and less demand for gas could result in lower gas prices.
■ Linda McNulty: No, but if we took those speed bumps out of downtown, then people would stop slamming on their brakes ... and that might save some gas.
■ Lisa Pampuch: No. Speed limits should be about safety, not about trying to force drivers to use less fuel. Price will take care of fuel use.
■ John Quick: No. Previous efforts were ineffective. What is needed are more fuel efficient vehicles.
■ Emily Shem-Tov: It seems like it could have a lot of benefits, but would probably be a big enforcement problem (doesn't seem like anyone keeps to the speed limit now on 101!).
■ Steve Staloch: Yes, if the legislation required that the savings - estimated at 2 percent of consumption - also be reflected in the price at the pumps, and is bundled with a broader long-term plan to achieve oil independence.
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.
